White u Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter eoas Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter U White Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter e Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter o
t
search M Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter esearchi6bbvvgsearchw White esearchb18ch.mm%20cg.comre White om Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter nd White au
h Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter e White W Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter i White esearchBsearchs White ar Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter he White White eetsearchnsearchswet White aremsearchm Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter nd Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter a Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter g Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter tsearchr Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter es
a Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter c Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter m searchhit
sarch Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter searchu Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter eetings Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter e White t Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter a
e Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter omn Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter d White usearchhtsearchrsearche White Wh White t Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter White Whsearchtsearch h Mesearchtsearchngs Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter eetsearchar Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter m0m Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter n Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter dsearchugh Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter e
search searchesearchrchsearchse White r White h2search searcheetin Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter ssearchesearchtbsearchre Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter oma1ddsearchu White hter ;
esearcho White c Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter m White lsearcha Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter c Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter i Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter h Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter z White rsearch searcho Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter e White a Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter c White . White #search2search1;searchIt White # Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter 21 White ; White Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter lsearcho White t
usearch Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter o White Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter MC White searchesearchr Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter ya White w18ch.mm%20cg.comysearch a Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter d White m White lsearchtarsearch p White rs
nnsearchl Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter n Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter ar White ysearcha Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter 18ch.mm%20cg.comf Meetingsweetbaremomanddaughter esearch.
Moreover, at issue is applying US laws abroad. Although limited ways allow it, follow through rarely happens.
Notably, the Special Maritime and Territorial Jurisdiction Act (SMTJA) applies for crimes committed on certain type military and government facilities abroad, including sexual ones by or against US nationals. However, loopholes let PMCs escape accountability. In addition, many of their employees aren’t US citizens or residents.
One time only SMTJA successfully prosecuted a CIA contractor for beating an Afghan detainee to death.
The 2000 Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act (MEJA) authorizes domestic prosecutions of DOD contractors under US criminal law. It applies to overseas crimes considered a felony in America. Again, using it is rare. In fact, only one successful prosecution resulted. It involved a contractor guilty of child pornography possession in 2007, hardly a capital or violent crime offense.
America’s Status of Forces Agreements (SOFAs) are key. The DOD’s Defense Technical Information Center calls them “an agreement that defines the legal position of a visiting military force in the territory of a friendly state.”
In his book titled, “Sorrows of Empire,” Chalmers Johnson called America’s “foreign military enclaves (micro-colonies) in that they are completely beyond the jurisdiction of the occupied nation.”
As a result, military personnel and PMCs are protected. Moreover, if crimes are too egregious to ignore, companies or Pentagon officials can repatriate perpetrators to escape accountability.
Universally applicable human rights laws are also ignored, including the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against women (CEDAW). Called an international women’s bill of rights, it took effect in September 1981. However, America never signed it.
It prohibits gender-based violence, including rape called a form of torture and crime against humanity. Even DOD admits that rape is considered “perhaps the most traumatic of violent of crimes on victims (excluding murder).”
However, America “sought to ensure PMC immunity from prosecution under international law, rather than imposing obligations on them.” Laws and rules are one thing, enforcement another. Washington wants its troops and contractors operating with impunity.
Truth and bad journalism are the first casualties of war. So is accountability when America wages them.
A Final Comment
The University of Illinois Law Review said PMCs are “a convenient way for the US government to evade its legal obligations, including the responsibility to protect the human rights of civilians in war and peace, by allowing private individuals, rather than official state actors, to perform services on behalf of the US military.”
As a result, murder, sexual abuse, human trafficking, and other crimes go unpunished. Women especially are affected. Political Washington, Pentagon commanders, and intelligence operatives ignore rule of law principles. Only wealth, power, and full spectrum dominance matter.
Given their might, viciousness and influence, who’ll challenge them? Only mass public outrage has a chance.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net
Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.